Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian Pediatr ; 2013 December; 50(12): 1159-1160
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170102
2.
Indian Pediatr ; 2010 Oct; 47(10): 851-856
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-168672

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To evaluate the growth pattern of Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) infants (birthweight <1500g) during hospital stay and to compare the growth of Small for gestational age (SGA) and Appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants. Study design: Prospective observational study. Setting. Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Northern India. Participants: A cohort of 97 VLBW infants, admitted to NICU at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, from 1 January, 2007 to 31 July, 2008. Intervention/Measurement: Weight, length and head circumference (HC) were serially measured from birth till discharge and respective Z scores were calculated as per data from Fenton’s references. Growth was also assessed by superimposing these trends on Ehrenkranz’s postnatal growth charts. Results: The mean Z scores for weight, length and HC at birth were –1.17, –1.09 and –0.54, respectively. These decreased to –2.16, –2.24 and –1.35, respectively by discharge. Both SGA and AGA infants exhibited a decrease of approximately 1 Z score in all parameters. On postnatal charts, growth of infants remained at or above respective reference lines, except in those below 1000g at birth. Average daily weight gain after regaining birth weight was 15.18 ± 1.7 g/kg/d, whereas the increase in HC and length were 0.48 ± 0.2 cm/week and 0.60 ± 0.4 cm/week, respectively. These increments when compared to the intrauterine growth rates, indicated discrepant growth trends. Conclusions: VLBW infants suffered significant growth lag during NICU stay and exhibited disproportionately slow growth of HC and length.

3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-143027

ABSTRACT

Background: Using abdominal packs is often a life-saving technique for uncontrollable bleeding during operations. It prevents worsening of the hypothermia, coagulopathy and acidosis which usually accompanies massive bleeding till they may be corrected and the packs removed later. However, packing may be associated with a mortality of 56 to 82 % due to continued bleeding, intra-abdominal abscesses and the compartment syndrome. We follow a policy of early abdominal packing (considering it after a 6 unit intraoperative blood loss) before the situation becomes irreversible. Patients and methods: Between January 1997 and September 2008, abdominal packing for uncontrollable bleed was done in 49 patients (M:F 34:15, mean age 43 years) . The risk factors for mortality were analyzed. The reasons for uncontrollable bleed were : liver trauma (8), liver tumours (3), following liver transplantation (4), pancreatic necrosectomy (17) and miscellaneous causes (17). Results: There were 16 postoperative deaths (32.7%). On univariate analysis, hypovolaemic shock, a low urine output, raised INR, blood requirement of more than 6 units, hypothermia <340C, metabolic acidosis and sepsis were associated with an increased mortality. However, on multivariate logistic regression only hypothermia was significantly associated with mortality. Conclusion: A fair survival rate can be achieved by early and judicious use of abdominal packing especially before hypothermia supervenes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL